Hello Ross, No problem, I will change the patch to use it the stable branch which I think it will be better.
I will send this asap... Thanks a lot for the reply! Best Regards, On Qua, 2015-04-15 at 16:01 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi, > > On 1 April 2015 at 13:52, Bottazzini, Bruno > <bruno.bottazz...@intel.com> wrote: > The previous patch was done in the way you said but, Khem Raj > suggested > that we should use it as patches. > > Copying and Pasting what he said: > "Thats good, although we have to be open on stable branch to > do SRCREV > updates which we hardly do. We only backport fixed via master > so I see this as pointless from that angle." > > > At the time - when master was frozen - that was true. But > unfortunately this didn't get applied in time for Fido, as a > non-trivial patch that doesn't fix existing bugs there's a large > barrier to pass. Now that master is open the systemd recipe can in > fact track the stable git branch instead, and insert the git hash into > the PV so it's obvious that it's taken from git. > > > Assuming that patch gets merged and doesn't cause problems, then it > would be up to the Fido maintainer (that's Joshua Lock) to decide > whether to merge a backport, which could well end up being this patch. > > > Sorry about this, the final stage of the release was quite busy and > this slipped straight through my fingers. > > > Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core