Greetings all,
The other day I threw together a proof of concept of do_unpack using the python modules for the archives.. sadly, the performance is such that we should likely stick to our current method, though it results in a lot of extra dependencies. See http://github.com/kergoth/OpenEmbedded/commits/kergoth/unpack. In the process, however, I did do a bit of cleanup / reorg that I think we may want to pull in. http://github.com/kergoth/OpenEmbedded/commit/3def3ba3d4860983f2d8f082eb528c4b84f83b50 I think it's an improvement, though I admit that the way I pass in the parm and env is lame. I wanted to avoid passing in the datastore or url directly, limiting oe_unpack_file's knowledge to the source, destination, and options. Thoughts? -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
