Did anyone have a chance to take a look at the linked commit? :) On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Chris Larson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Greetings all, > > The other day I threw together a proof of concept of do_unpack using the > python modules for the archives.. sadly, the performance is such that we > should likely stick to our current method, though it results in a lot of > extra dependencies. See > http://github.com/kergoth/OpenEmbedded/commits/kergoth/unpack. In the > process, however, I did do a bit of cleanup / reorg that I think we may want > to pull in. > http://github.com/kergoth/OpenEmbedded/commit/3def3ba3d4860983f2d8f082eb528c4b84f83b50 > I think it's an improvement, though I admit that the way I pass in the parm > and env is lame. I wanted to avoid passing in the datastore or url > directly, limiting oe_unpack_file's knowledge to the source, destination, > and options. Thoughts? > -- > Christopher Larson > clarson at kergoth dot com > Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus > Maintainer - Tslib > Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics > -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
