* Ulf Samuelsson <ulf_samuels...@telia.com> [111018 14:06]: > 2011-10-18 08:28, Anders Darander skrev: > > * Ulf Samuelsson<ulf_samuels...@telia.com> [111017 22:45]: > >> If anyone is interested... > > Build stats are always interesting... ;)
> >> Same machine in two different configurations. > >> .........................................................#1...........................#2 > >> P8Z68V Pro > >> Core-i7 2600K @ 3.4 GHz..................4.4 > >> GHz > >> 8 GB @ ...........................................1333 > >> MHz...............1640 MHz > >> 1TB WD Black 7200 RPM > >> Ubuntu 11-10 > >> Almost all source code already in source directory > > This would severely restrict the usefulness of the comparison. I'd guess > > that this means that in one case the source will be downloaded, while > > it'll already be downloaded in the second test. Could you redo the > > statistics with all sources downloaded? > I had already built it once before running the first test then updated > and I think one additional package was downloaded over a 100 MBps line > so it affects a little, but not too much. Ok, just curious. Not least as you had one image fail in the first configuration, which you attributed to a failed download. That remark made me wonder... Cheers, Anders > I think the conclusion: > Increasing the CPU speed by 30% and the memory frequency by 20% > gives 10-15% faster build time is OK. > >> Building meta-toolchain is 13% faster with overclocking. > > Was the overclocking test run after the non-overclocking? -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel