2011-10-18 14:19, Anders Darander skrev:
* Ulf Samuelsson<ulf_samuels...@telia.com>  [111018 14:06]:
2011-10-18 08:28, Anders Darander skrev:
* Ulf Samuelsson<ulf_samuels...@telia.com>   [111017 22:45]:
If anyone is interested...
Build stats are always interesting... ;)
Same machine in two different configurations.
.........................................................#1...........................#2
P8Z68V Pro
Core-i7 2600K @                             3.4 GHz..................4.4 GHz
8 GB @ ...........................................1333
MHz...............1640 MHz
1TB WD Black 7200 RPM
Ubuntu 11-10
Almost all source code already in source directory
This would severely restrict the usefulness of the comparison. I'd guess
that this means that in one case the source will be downloaded, while
it'll already be downloaded in the second test. Could you redo the
statistics with all sources downloaded?
I had already built it once before running the first test then updated
and I think one additional package was downloaded over a 100 MBps line
so it affects a little, but not too much.
Ok, just curious. Not least as you had one image fail in the first
configuration, which you attributed to a failed download. That remark
made me wonder...

OK, To be 100% correct:
I built meta-toolchain first so all packages for that build should be there.
This is much longer than anything else, so this is a good comparision.

Then the build #1 was started and measruements was taken.
This failed for core-image-sato due to one missing package, which
After build #1 was completed, I downloaded the missing package
and started build #2.


Cheers,
Anders

I think the conclusion:
      Increasing the CPU speed by 30% and the memory frequency by 20%
      gives 10-15% faster build time is OK.
Building meta-toolchain is 13% faster with overclocking.
Was the overclocking test run after the non-overclocking?



--
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to