On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: >> Applying patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch >> patching file gcc/config/alpha/elf.h >> patching file gcc/config/ia64/linux.h >> patching file gcc/config/linux.h >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 89 (offset -12 lines). >> patching file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 908. >> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >> Patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch does not apply (enforce with -f) >> ERROR: Function failed: patch_do_patch >> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: >> /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.5-r45+svnr181733/temp/log.do_patch.5367 >> NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r45+svnr181733: task do_patch: Failed >> ERROR: Task 2829 >> (/home/Superandy/data/oe-core/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.bb, >> do_patch) failed with exit code '1' >> >> git log does not help me much - what goes wrong? > > Which actual patch is it failing on? Is there a conflict between > oe-core and meta-oe patch set against gcc?
gcc45-no-add-needed.patch is the patch in question. I dont see anything wrong with it. Can you do bitbake -ccleanall gcc-cross-initial and redo bitbake gcc-cross-initial -cpatch ? _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel