On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: >>> Applying patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch >>> patching file gcc/config/alpha/elf.h >>> patching file gcc/config/ia64/linux.h >>> patching file gcc/config/linux.h >>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 89 (offset -12 lines). >>> patching file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 908. >>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h >>> Patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch does not apply (enforce with -f) >>> ERROR: Function failed: patch_do_patch >>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: >>> /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.5-r45+svnr181733/temp/log.do_patch.5367 >>> NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r45+svnr181733: task do_patch: Failed >>> ERROR: Task 2829 >>> (/home/Superandy/data/oe-core/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.bb, >>> do_patch) failed with exit code '1' >>> >>> git log does not help me much - what goes wrong? >> >> Which actual patch is it failing on? Is there a conflict between >> oe-core and meta-oe patch set against gcc? > > gcc45-no-add-needed.patch is the patch in question. I dont see > anything wrong with it. > Can you do bitbake -ccleanall gcc-cross-initial and redo bitbake > gcc-cross-initial -cpatch ? > FYI: I removed the line which came in by the commits I mentioned above
should_apply[vardepsexclude] += "PN" in openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc and build from scratch works without issues. Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel