On 16.11.2015 10:43, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >>>>> 1) or even better in a separate repo >>>> >>>> To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo >>>> myself. It >>>> would be consistent with what has been done with Qt 5 and much >>>> earlier with >>>> Qt 3. >>> >>> Agreed. >> >> I'm also fine with separate layer. >> >> Even better for me, I'll be less tempted to include it in my world >> builds and to fix qt-mobility-* issues. > > Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, > and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle > those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if > there is no official maintainer or ongoing build testing for it at least > until someone volunteers to pick it up.
Basically everyone agreed on moving qt4 to its own repo. And your conclusion is to ignore that and move qt4 to meta-openembedded, already expecting bitrot? Regards, Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel