On Monday 16 November 2015 12:26:05 Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/16/2015 12:07 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > >> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, > >> and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle > >> those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if > >> there is no official maintainer or ongoing build testing for it at least > >> until someone volunteers to pick it up. > > > > Basically everyone agreed on moving qt4 to its own repo. And your > > conclusion is to ignore that and move qt4 to meta-openembedded, already > > expecting bitrot? > > Are you willing to be the maintainer of that separate repo? So far no > one has stepped up for this job. In this situation, it's better to keep > the recipes under meta-openembedded tree and mark them as unmaintained. > > I'll ask this explicitly - any volunteers for a separate meta-qt4 > repository and layer maintenance?
Put my name against it if you need a name - no promises on how active I'll be though. I will definitely volunteer to do the initial move-out and repo creation so you wouldn't need to do anything. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel