Title: Eric CAUDAL
That sounds more than reasonable to me!
I still think that we need to advertise better the quality of the
code maintained by the community reviewer.
It seems stupid but this is important for the market to have clear
signals of quality that are easily found and identifiable.
Eric Caudal
CEO
--
Elico Corporation, Shanghai branch
OpenERP Premium Certified Training Partner
Cell: + 86 186 2136 1670
Office: + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37
Skype: elico.corp
[email protected]
http://www.elico-corp.com
On 07/09/2013 18:39, Stefan wrote:
On 09/07/2013 12:23 PM, Eric Caudal
wrote:
I would see the certification less as a technical quality
control and more as an operation of marketing and visibility
of the current community work.
Hi Eric,
It seems to me that the criteria mainly have technical
implications. Of course, the concerns you mention are all valid.
So what do you think of assigning this seal of approval simply
based on whether a module comes from a project which falls under
the community review, while making the requirements that you
expressed explicit in the reviewing guidelines (maybe after
reviewing some existing code for older modules)?
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
Therp - Maatwerk in open ontwikkeling
Stefan Rijnhart - Ontwerp en implementatie
mail: [email protected]
tel: +31 (0) 614478606
web: http://therp.nl
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
|
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
