Hi,
I'm a bit curious to this too....so here is the top portion of the license:
Copyright © 2007 Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
(A.M.P.A.S.). Portions contributed by others as indicated. All rights
reserved.
A worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive right to distribute, copy,
modify, create derivatives, and use, in source and binary forms, is
hereby granted, subject to acceptance of this license. Performance of
any of the aforementioned acts indicates acceptance to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
* Redistributions of source code, in whole or in part, must retain
the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
Disclaimer of Warranty.
* Redistributions in binary form must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the Disclaimer of Warranty in
the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
distribution.
* Nothing in this license shall be deemed to grant any rights to
trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets or any other
intellectual property of A.M.P.A.S. or any contributors, except as
expressly stated herein. Neither the name "A.M.P.A.S." nor the
name of any other contributors to this software may be used to
endorse or promote products derivative of or based on this
software without express prior written permission of A.M.P.A.S. or
the contributors, as appropriate.
* This license shall be construed pursuant to the laws of the State
of California, and any disputes related thereto shall be subject
to the jurisdiction of the courts therein.
Which clause in the license are you referring to that makes it
incompatible?
Thanks,
Hai
Cyrille Berger wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007, you wrote:
What do you mean by "incompatible"?
I mean GPL project can't be linked with ctl and therefore can't use the ctl
library.
_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
