It depends on what the moon's copyright laws are. If you were to
replace "State of California"
with "the moon" in the current license. I technically don't have to be
there - unless I plan on
disputing license. And even in that regard, I could grant power of
attorney to the many
lawyers who have offices on the moon.
...I am kidding of course. My original intent was to inquire about the
structure in which
the licenses were incompatible - not the value of either licenses.
Maybe I should have
chosen better words.
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
Who would use a library from a vendor with jurisdiction on the moon?
Good luck for falling ticket prices in case you need one.
With focus on the jurisdiction in the CTL license this point is more
restrictive than with GPL.
Why not stick to a pure BSD? Xorg works this quite well with all the
OpenGL stuff these days.
regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
--
developing for colour management
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org
Am 05.12.07, 12:59 -0800 schrieb Hai Nguyen:
It seems to me that the GPL is not compatible with the CTL, not the other way
around.
_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
