Discussions here at ILM tend to focus more on East Coast vs. West Coast
pizza, whether it is possible to make decent bagels outside New York, or
David Hasselhoff. Would you guys like to offer your opinions?
Chris Cox wrote:
No, OpenEXR has added as many flavors, possibly more.
Yes, there can be bugs in some applications that prevent interoperation -
but the same is true for any file format.
It sounds like you're avoiding TIFF because you just don't know TIFF.
Chris
On 2/22/07 1:45 PM, "John Coldrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 22 February 2007 16:36, Chris Cox wrote:
I do find it amusing that most of the "advantages" of OpenEXR he lists
apply equally to TIFF and libTIFF. About the only thing missing from TIFF
is the channel naming convention.
...and a lack of 1000 flavours that render constant exchange problems between
platforms and applications. That's why we avoid tiff as much as we can.
J.C.
_______________________________________________
Openexr-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-user
_______________________________________________
Openexr-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-user
