On Don, 2011-04-07 at 12:09 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: 
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 12:01 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Mit, 2011-04-06 at 20:46 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: 
> > > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 20:12 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > [...] 
> > > > But doesn't
> > > >         depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
> > > > 
> > > > always evaluate to true when running "make *config"? (Even if RFKILL is
> > > > an unknown symbol when that expression is parsed!)
> > > 
> > > No, it will not, you're forgetting that these things are tristate.
> > 
> > Boolean operators for tristate logic isn't intuitive at all IMHO.
> 
> *shrug*. You're free to propose patches to the kconfig system to make it
> more intuitive. :-)

FullACK;-)
But no intuitive tristate logic operators come to my mind (otherwise I
would have mentioned them above).
And there are more logic implications in "depends on RFKILL".
Hmm, I have to think more about it ....

Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : be...@petrovitsch.priv.at
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at


Reply via email to