On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 16:32 -0700, Big Wave Dave wrote:
> I have used both... and can confirm that the 9500 is considerably
> faster than the 8500 series.
> If you are simply using this storage for backup... then the 8506 is
> great.  However, if it is going to be a primary fileserver, I would
> recommend paying the extra for the 9500.
> Please note that I have NOT used either under openfiler... just under
> Linux in general.  I know that under Knoppix, it will load the 3w-xxxx
> driver for the 9500, when in reality it needs the 3w-9xxx driver.

The Escalade 9000 series is faster for RAID-5
- The 9500S adds SDRAM (Synchronous DRAM) for buffering.
- The 9550SX adds an IBM PowerPC 400 series embedded microcontroller
with SDRAM.

For RAID-0, 1 or 10, they _all_ use (the 7000 series forward) the same
ASIC with SRAM (Static RAM) for 0 wait state, non-blocking operations.
So if you want the ultimate in read _and_ write performance, RAID-10 is
typically the way to go.

-- Bryan

NOTE:  Areca's Intel X-Scale power ARC-11x0 (PCI-X) and ARC-12x0 (PCIe)
series are getting rave reviews for their RAID-5 and RAID-6 performance.
The 400+MHz X-Scale (superscalar ARM) seem to be able to handle data
transfer rates (DTRs) in excess of what the 3Ware ASIC (9500S) or IBM
PowerPC 40x (9550SX) seem to be able to handle.  However, Areca is newer
and doesn't have the same track record on Linux or always work
"out-of-the-box" -- although many people like them so far (including
myself).


-- 
Bryan J. Smith            Professional, technical annoyance
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      http://thebs413.blogspot.com
-----------------------------------------------------------
Americans don't get upset because citizens in some foreign
nations can burn the American flag -- Americans get upset
because citizens in those same nations can't burn their own


_______________________________________________
Openfiler-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users

Reply via email to