the difference between the two tests (it seems) is that our upstream CSIT
longevity is bringing 200 switches up and down in a relatively short
period.  Whereas Saibal's test is keeping 120 up for many hours at a time.

agreed that a bug with karaf.log is needed.

Thanks for testing Saibal.

JamO

On 03/24/2016 10:06 AM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> We have longevity test bringing up & down 200 switches continuously so we 
> have not observed this particular issue. Does
> your issue reproduce consistently? Can you open a bug and upload the karaf 
> log?
> 
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 3:17 AM, Saibal Roy <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>  
>> I was testing the Longevity test using OVS 2.3.2 and connecting 120 switches 
>> across the cluster(40 per controller)
>> using latest  Be Code with He Plugin.
>>  
>> I could see that  118 switches are connected and 2 switches are disconnected 
>> if I run it for overnight(8 hours).
>>  
>> Has someone encountered this Longevity issue earlier? Or will I raise a BUG 
>> for this.
>>  
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Saibal Roy.
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
>> [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to