> On Jul 20, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote:
> 
> On 21/07/17 00:32, Sam Hague wrote:
>> What was the reasoning not to absorb liblldp into the openflow project?
>> Because lldp isn't part of openflow? That makes sense and I don't think
>> we will find a project as this really is it's own protocol.
> 
> I do not agree with that -- LLDP is a full-blown protocol, but liblldp
> does not implement the data plane part of it (but hey, anyone could do
> that using liblldp).

I am not sure what this library does but if it is primarily used to process 
LLDP packets, today I do not see any protocol/plugin other than OpenFlow to 
send LLDP frames to controller. For that reason I do not see major issue in 
including this code in openflowplugin. On the other hand if we can replace this 
by an external library, that would be my first choice.

> 
>> For the sake of finding a good place to park it, though, ofp is a good
>> project since ofp uses the lib and genius and netvirt use ofp.
> 
> I started off with thinking it would better be absorbed, but the mailing
> list discussion made me see the benefit of it being a separate project.
> 
>> If not, what was the consensus on if we could reduce the process
>> requirements for making this it's own project? Could we just make the
>> project and let it automatically get pass on the milestones? Make it
>> such that we only have the startup costs to migrate it to a project, get
>> it building and leave it on auto-pilot.
> 
> The primary reason is that this is self-contained piece of code, which
> depends on odlparent only and has utterly stable codebase.
> 
> Note that odlparent is released independently of autorelease, which
> means so can this project.
> 
> That means we only have to build this project once per odlparent release
> (if even necessary), test it once and then reuse it across downstream
> projects. No -SNAPSHOTS involved.
> 
> Hence yes, this is a project-on-autopilot. It just needs a caretaker.
> 
> That does not preclude it from being a fully active project in the
> future though.
> 
> Regards,
> Robert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> controller-dev mailing list
> controller-...@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to