Le Mer 5 juin 2013 21:23, Vernon Adams a écrit : > "Any other means of delivering a > font to another person is considered 'distribution" Correct? > So... that single file that is pulled into your browser cache from typekit > etc is a distribution of an OFL font.
When I pushed for Fedora to officially endorse the OFL, it was very clear in my mind that embedding was still a distribution of the font bits, and that the OFL embedding clause merely stated there was a requirement boundary between the embedded font and the rest of the document. I'm pretty sure the public debate at that time was crystal-clear on this point (wish for a lgpl-like barrier between the font and the document created with the font, for the same reason the FSF had to propose a font exception to the GPL). I'm quite saddened the OFL FAQ has been used since to twist the license meaning, without any public debate and just for convenience. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot