Vladimir Kotal <vladimir.ko...@oracle.com> writes:

> On 01/16/12 16:18, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>> Trond Norbye<trond.nor...@gmail.com>  writes:
>>
>>> Or is anyone working on fixing this?
>>
>> I guess the lack of response answers this question...
>>
>> As to the question about reverting the changes, does anyone know what
>> would be the minimum to back out in order to get the old behaviour back?
>> The UI changes came in as part of a pretty big refactoring patch, IIRC,
>> and probably many of the changes that have gone in later depend on the
>> refactoring, so reverting the UI stuff isn't necessarily easier than
>> fixing it.
>>
>
> Only couple of minor changes are necessary to fix the UI. I am going
> to fix the '..' link.

I've changed the style sheets so that the browser's default fonts are
used, which seems to fix the issue with too big fonts. (Not sure it
fixed the related issue with too small fonts mentioned in the bug
report. Vlad, you might want to double-check that.)

That leaves only two issues to be fixed on bug #19105, I think:

1) Missing white lines between code lines (perhaps not a stopper?)

2) Garbled headers in Internet Explorer

-- 
Knut Anders
_______________________________________________
opengrok-discuss mailing list
opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opengrok-discuss

Reply via email to