Thank Gang Liu for showing interest into the topic and responding.  I had 
already gone through that wiki before I sent the email, and was a little 
confused, and am even now.  The Signalling Proxy mode, to my understanding, 
normalizes a lot of protocol directives.  For example, after reading through a 
lot of mails in this mailing list, I had the impression that GnuGK can 
sometimes talk to endpoints that are a bit deviant than H323 protocol.

Protocol conversion is something that GnuGK can't do.  The SBC concept also 
seems to have stemmed from the SIP stack.  Another feature that SBCs seem to 
have is having ability to route media to different endpoints than the 
signalling endpoint, making it possible to do CALEA or LI.

Thanks for your Ideas once again.  I hope some other guys over here could also 
share their understanding on the issue.

Regards
HASSAN



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gang Liu 
  To: GNU Gatekeeper Users 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 16:41
  Subject: Re: [Openh323gk-users] Theoretical Question - SessionBorderController


  GNUGK could work as signaling gateway and relay RTP streams. And most time it 
is good.
  But It works in signal proxy mode. mostly SBC productions in the market have 
much more features.For example, fix or change protocols and protocol syntax to 
achieve interoperability. I have a case before, some devices must work in 
normal start mode, but the other only can support fast-start mode.

  If u refer gnugk as a SBC, then I think it isn't a full features SBC.

  You can take a look at this
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_Border_Controller

  regards,
  Gang


  On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Nyamul Hassan <[email protected]> wrote:

    Thank you Gang for your input here.  According to the Wikipedia page on 
B2BUA:

    The Back-to-Back User Agent (B2BUA) acts as a user agent to both ends of a 
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) call. The B2BUA is responsible for handling 
all SIP signalling between both ends of the call, from call establishment to 
termination. Each call is tracked from beginning to end, allowing the operators 
of the B2BUA to offer value-added features to the call.

    and,

    A Signaling gateway, part of a Session Border Controller, or Asterisk PBX 
are good examples of a B2BUA.

    The last statement particularly puts me off, as the SBC page on Wikipedia 
also suggests that "Signalling Mode" GnuGKs also function as a partial SBC.  Is 
this correct?  Or am I missing something?

    Regards
    HASSAN



      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Gang Liu 
      To: GNU Gatekeeper Users 
      Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 10:14
      Subject: Re: [Openh323gk-users] Theoretical Question - Session 
BorderController


      I don't think gnugk is a SBC. For example, can one peer in normal start 
mode and the other call leg in fast start? mostly, SBC is a B2BUA.

      regards,
      Gang


      On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Nyamul Hassan <[email protected]> wrote:

        Hi,

        I have a theoretical question about the difference between a Session 
Border
        Controller and a Soft Switch.  Going through some googled documents, it
        appears there is very little difference between the two.  It appear 
GnuGK
        can work as an SBC for H323 endpoints.  Am I being wrong in making this
        assumption?  Can someone shed some light on this issue?

        Regards
        HASSAN


        
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        _______________________________________________________

        Posting: mailto:[email protected]
        Archive: 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
        Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
        Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/





--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________________

      Posting: mailto:[email protected]
      Archive: 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
      Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
      Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________________

    Posting: mailto:[email protected]
    Archive: 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
    Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
    Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________________

  Posting: mailto:[email protected]
  Archive: 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
  Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
  Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:[email protected]
Archive: 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

Reply via email to