Sorry to keep the questions coming - I did add catchall to the RoutingLRQ
Config:
[RoutingPolicy]
default=explicit,internal,parent,neighbor
[RoutingPolicy::OnLRQ]
;0048=internal
default=internal,catchall
[Routing::CatchAll]
CatchAllIP=xx.xx.xx.54
Logs:
2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 1 RasSrv.cxx(368) RAS LRQ
Received from 10.35.59.170:1719
2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 2 Toolkit.cxx(560)
RewriteToE164: [email protected] to 123
2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 3 gkauth.h(933) GKAUTH default LRQ
check ok
2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 5 Routing.h(177) ROUTING Checking
policy Internal for the request LRQ 28943
2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 2 RasSrv.cxx(408)
LRJ|10.35.59.170|[email protected]:h323_ID|10.35.59.170|requestDenied;
2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 3 RasSrv.cxx(250) RAS Send to
10.35.59.170:1719
locationReject {
requestSeqNum = 28943
rejectReason = requestDenied <<null>>
}
2012/03/30 12:53:26.328 5 RasSrv.cxx(264) RAS Sent
Successful
It does not seem to use teh catchall policy for routing it appears.
Thanks
Maulik
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Maulik Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> I prefer catch all - will give that a shot.
>
> I did try adding this as a permanent EP but in the LCF GnuGk sends back
> the Call Signal Port as 0 or 1721, even though I added it as 1720
>
> 2012/03/30 09:58:55.647 1 RasTbl.cxx(282) New
> EP|x.x.x.54:1720|e.bjn.vc:h323_ID|gateway|8358_endp
> 2012/03/30 09:58:55.647 2 RasTbl.cxx(1944) Add permanent
> endpoint x.x.x.54:1720
>
> Routing:
> 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 3 gkauth.h(933) GKAUTH default
> LRQ check ok
> 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 5 Routing.h(177) ROUTING Checking
> policy Internal for the request LRQ 28936
> 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 2 RasTbl.cxx(1336) RASTBL Gateway
> 8358_endp matched as a default gateway
> 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 4 RasTbl.cxx(1724) RASTBL Prefix
> match for gateways:
> 199.48.152.54:1720
> 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 5 Routing.h(183) ROUTING Policy
> Internal applied to the request LRQ 28936
> 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 2 RasSrv.cxx(408)
> LCF|10.35.59.170|8358_endp|[email protected]:h323_ID|10.35.59.170;
> 2012/03/30 09:59:55.098 3 RasSrv.cxx(250) RAS Send to
> 10.35.59.170:1719
> locationConfirm {
> requestSeqNum = 28936
> callSignalAddress = ipAddress {
> ip = 4 octets {
> xx xx xx 36 .0.6
> }
> port = 1721
> }
> rasAddress = ipAddress {
> ip = 4 octets {
> xx xx xx 36 .0.6
> }
> port = 1719
> }
> }
>
> BTW the apt-get install uses GNUGK 2.3.0, not 2.3.6
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks
> Maulik
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jan Willamowius <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> no, I meant when you use the 'catchall' policy, GnuGk will send a LCF
>> for all LRQs, even if there is no endpoint that exactly matches the
>> request. If thats what you want, use 'catchall'.
>> If you only want to send LCFs for requests that match your endpoints,
>> use the 'internal' policy.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jan
>>
>> Maulik wrote:
>> > Hi Jan
>> > Thx for the response - just to clarify you meant to send an LCF for s
>> non registered endpt, not avoid an LCF - correct?
>> >
>> > Thx
>> > Maulik
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Jan Willamowius <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Maulik,
>> > >
>> > > as you said, the latest release of GnuGk is 3.0.1. Version 3.1 is
>> still
>> > > in development and you can't get a packaged version, yet. You can get
>> > > the source code from the CVS and compile it yourself, but please
>> > > remember its not a release version, yet.
>> > >
>> > > The 'catchall' policy is available since GnuGk 2.3.1, but to avoid
>> > > sending an LCF for a non existing endpoint, you might want to use the
>> > > 'internal' policy instead. If your gateway doesn't register, configure
>> > > it as a "permanent endpoint". See the manual for details.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Jan
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jan Willamowius, Founder of the GNU Gatekeeper Project
>> > > EMail : [email protected]
>> > > Website: http://www.gnugk.org
>> > > Support: http://www.willamowius.com/gnugk-support.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Maulik Shah wrote:
>> > >> Hi All
>> > >> Am a newbie to GnuGK and have looked through the aliases and a
>> little
>> > >> lost on a couple of items:
>> > >>
>> > >> 1. The Manuals on gnugk show they are for version 3.1 but the latest
>> stable
>> > >> version is 3.0.1 for Linux (Ubuntu apt-get is at 2.3.x) - how can I
>> get a
>> > >> Linux 64 bit tar for version 3.1?
>> > >>
>> > >> 2. Our basic use case for GnuGK is to act as a very simple dir GK:
>> > >>
>> > >> Receive LRQ from anonymous video GKs (such as Tandberg VCS) for our
>> domain
>> > >> (say [email protected]) and sent back an LCF with the host@GWIP port
>> 1720. I
>> > >> was going to use the CatchAll routing policy but when i add that to
>> the
>> > >> gatekeeper.ini config, I get an error saying the policy is unknown. I
>> > >> cannot have our GW register as it does not support RAS, is there any
>> way to
>> > >> configure this on the GnuGK without CatchAll?
>> > >>
>> > >> Appreciate the help in advance
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks
>> > >> Maulik
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jan Willamowius, [email protected], http://www.gnugk.org/
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF email is sponsosred by:
>> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
>> _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Posting: mailto:[email protected]
>> Archive:
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
>> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:[email protected]
Archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
