This is a rant ...

I have used software with and without pick lists; pick lists are MUCH SLOWER.
        They require taking your hands off the keyboard
        They are often long
        The software often fails to handle the "folding" of the list well for many 
reasons.
        Afterward, the hands must go back on the keyboard
        The pick list is just one more opportunity for bugs to show up.

Example 1:  The Federal Aviation Administration Medical Examiner software uses pick 
lists in several places
for data entry of the 8500-8 form (used for pilot exams).  The number of manual 
operations required to choose
a pick list item, and the number of movements requiring precise accuracy, are far more 
than the number of
operations necessary to type in the name of a short item.

Example 2:  The Medical Letter drug interactions web site, which I've been using for 
almost 2 years, allows
the entry of up to six drug names and does not use pick lists.  I have found these to 
be extremely fast,
responsive, and bug free.  This does require that one learn how to spell drug names, 
but to do so is well
within the intellectual range of any person with at least a baccalaureate degree, and 
only one or two
iterations are generally required to learn the spelling, or the victim is not paying 
attention to his own
spelling behavior.

In general, interface designers create more work in the name of "ease" than efficiency 
experts can ever remove
in the name of ergonomics.

amarcelo wrote:
> 
> In my field of practice, I could not remember more than two instances when
> I had to order anti-psychotic drugs for my patients (primarily because I
> am not a psychiatrist.

        If you can't remember a drug well enough to spell it, you cannot remember it 
well enough to prescribe it.  We
doc must know the therapeutic effects, the expected and the common idiosyncratic side 
effects, the major drug
and food interactions, and the indications.  To know the spelling is a small 
additional morsel of information,
one which signals that perhaps the doc is capable of attending to and retaining small, 
important nuggets of
information.  We should not create pick lists that help a professional bypass the 
knowledge-refreshment
process.

Horst wrote:
 
> 
> > Doctors (and other health professionals) tend to be rather computer illiterate AND 
>impatient. They want everything spoonfed by the application, and that without delay. 
>Understandable, I have the same demands.
        We all need to grow up at some point... :)
To make software more complex because the user imagines it should bring all desired 
services on a platter as
soon as the thought strikes is one of the driving forces in bloatware and in 
ergonomically frustrating
interfaces, as the programmer desperately tries to please everyone in every 
conceivable way and ends up
pleasing no one.

End of paternalistic rant...

> > Now, when I choose a drug to prescribe or a patient, I will choose from a pick 
>list ("combo box" type). Both in case of patients and drugs I will select from 
>several tens of thousands of values. The pick list has to show alternatives from the 
>second letter entered already for resons I'll explain later - that usually leaves a 
>_lot_ of possible entries. Of course, everything has to appear instantly on the 
>screen.
...clip...
> >
> > If you have a patent solution for these ultra-long pick lists, please let me know.
> > The problem unfortunately does not stop here. Desopite [despite] their education 
>level, doctors (and nurses even more) seem to be somewhat dyslectic. I can stop 
>beeing falbberghasted [[flabbergasted] how many variations of the spelling of words 
>like "Amitriptyline" they come up with. The point is, they start entering Amy... and 
>the pick list does not show the desired drugs. Similar problem with names.
> >
> > Now, you might say, that's simple! Use soundex, ... clip...

Spell-checking algorithms probably have the best chance of working, especially as you 
can have a small and
limited lexicon (all known drug names) rather than the entire English language.  If 
you combine this with
common mis-spellings and permit user-chosen autocorrections, like 
amytrypliline>amitriptyline and
gentamycin>gentamicin, you can, I think, get closer.

A more interesting task is to make drug lists from therapeutic classes, and permit 
browsing by therapeutic
class, which is helpful sometimes in relieving a mental block.

One scheme of drug classes (incomplete, without drug names; designed for internal 
medicine outpatient
practice) is appended:

1.  Allergic disorders
        1A  Antiallergic drugs
        see also dermatitis, 4A;pruritis, 4E; ocular inflammation, 8C; asthma, 18A; 
allergic rhinitis, 18C & 18D
2.  Cardiovascular System
        2A. Antihypertensives
                2A1.  Diuretics (=2B)
                2A2.  Calcium-channel blockers (=2C1)
                2A3. ACE inhibitors
                2A4. ARB's
                2A5.  Beta-blockers (= 2C2)
                2A6.  Alpha-1 Antagonists
                2A7. Centrally-acting antihypertensives
        2B.  Diuretics
        2C.  Antianginals
                2C1.  Calcium Channel Blockers (=2A2)
                2C2. Beta blockers (=2A5)
                2C3.  Nitrates
        2D..  Antiarrhythmics
        2E.  Anticoagulants/antithrombotics
        2F.  Hypolipidemic agents (lipid-lowering agents)
        2G.  Circulatory/perfusion agents
3.  Central nervous system
        3A.  Hypnotics & Sedatives
        3B. Anxiolytics
        3C. Antipsychotics
        3D.  Mood Disorders/ OCD
        3E. Anticonvulsants
        3F. Antiparkinsonian Agents
        3G. Alzheimer's dementia
        3H. ADHD/narcolepsy
4.  Dermatological disorders
        4A. Topical steroids
                4A1. Low potency
                4A2.  Intermediate potency
                4A3.  High potency.
                4A4.  Super high potency
        4B   Acne preparations
        4C. Topical anti-infectives/antifungals
        4D. Psoriasis treatments
        4E. Emollients and antipruritics
        4F.  Scabicides/pediculocides
        4G. Wart treatments
        4H. Miscellaneous dermatologicals
5. Diagnostic agents.
6. Ear disorders
7. Endocrine disorders
        7A. Diabetes treatments.
        7B. Systemic corticosteroids
        7C. Thyroid drugs
8. Eye treatments
        8A.  Ophthalmic inti-infectives
        8B.  Glaucoma agents
        8C.  Ophthalmic anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory drugs
        8D.  Mydriatics
        8E.  Ocular lubricants
9. Gastrointestinal treatments
        9A.  Acid reduction
        9B.  GI motility agents
        9C.  Laxatives
        9D. Antidiarrheals
        9E. Colorectal agents
        9E. Antiemetics (some would put this under 3, Central Nervous System)
        9F. Enzymes, bile modifiers
10.  Immune system, including vaccines
11. Antibiologics
        11A.  Antibiotics and antibacterials
                11A1. Cephalosporins    
                11A2. Penicillins
                11A3. Macrolides
                11A4. Quinolones
                11A5. Sulfonamides
                11A6. Tetracyclines
                11A7. Aminoglycosides
        11B. Anti-fungals
        11C. Antimalarials
        11D. Anthelminthics
        11E.  Amebacides
        11F. Antivirals
        11G. Antituberculars
12.  Musculoskeletal agents
        12A. Anti-inflammatory drugs     (NSAID's)
        12B.  Gout remedies
        12C.  Muscle relaxants and agonists
        12D. Bone disorder treatments
13.  Antineoplastic agents
14.  Nutrition
15.  Ob/Gyn
        15A. Contraceptives
        15B.  Vaginal anti-infectives
        15C.  Menopausal treatments     
16.  Analgesics
        16A.  Non-narcotic analgesics (12A is a subset of this class)
        16B.  Narcotic analgesics (some people class this under 3, CNS) Brown
        16C.  Migraine remedies (some people class this under 3, CNS)
17.  Antidotes
18.  Respiratory disorders
        18A. Anti-asthmatics
        18B.  Antitussives
        18C.  Cold remedies
19.  Urologic drugs
        19A.  Erectile dysfunction
        19B.  Incontinence
        19C.  Retention

Reply via email to