Horst Herb wrote:
> 
> 
> I think this is a quite workable solution for some systems. I haven't tried this yet 
>(but I will sap) - but the first thought that comes to my head: one more table for 
>each list for each doctor - a hell of a lot of tables.  Probably each of them indexed 
>as well. Here goes my cache, my RAM..... =8-0  Wouldn't I be worse off at the end of 
>the day? Will tell you when I have tried.
> 
Well, this all is stored on the server side, where table space and index
space is not much of a limitation.  While we tend to use faster and more
expensive disks on our Oracle database system, Quantum is selling
network disk appliances with 120 Gig of space for $3000.  Disk and main
memory are just not limitations on the server side anymore.

Reply via email to