If you have limited resources (and, boy, do we ever around here), it's really good to do it all with one language. John Thomas Beale wrote: > I'm sure you're right. What I was trying to say in a roundabout way is that even if >there are specialist printing > applications, they will probably be programmed in something suitable for them, and >get their data from the EHR server via the > file system, web or middleware. > > - thomas beale
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UML's etc. Thomas Beale
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UML's ... John S. Gage
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UML's ... Thomas Beale
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UML's ... John S. Gage
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UM... Thomas Beale
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UML's ... Christian Heller
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UM... John S. Gage
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UML's ... Horst Herb
- Re: Programming languages versus IDL's,XML's, UM... John S. Gage
