http://www.headstar.com/futurehealth

- DR PAUL SCHMIDT.

* GOOD INFORMATION SAVES LIVES.
by Derek Parkinson �[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When hospitals make mistakes, hair-raising headlines and horror stories
often follow; but many of these errors can be traced back to old,
inefficient systems for processing information, according to Dr Paul
Schmidt, a physician at Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust. "A lot of the
horror stories happen because people are so busy: there are so many
things to remember and write down and pass on to the right people", he
says".

Schmidt aims to prove his point by developing an e-enabled Medical
Assessment Unit (MAU), plans for which he unveiled at last month's
Southern Institute for Health Informatics Conference hosted by the
University of Portsmouth. Aside from accident and emergency
departments, MAUs are the main route for patients into a hospital, the
difference being that a patient only arrives at an MAU after referral by a
practitioner.

But unlike accident and emergency departments, from where around 90
per cent of patients go home, MAU patients are often assessed for up to
36 hours and need long stays in hospital, with specialist treatments and
post-acute care. "With complex investigations it's essential to be able to
hand tasks on easily, but with a paper-based system it takes ages because
of the time needed to fill in forms," Schmidt says.

The remedy he has devised is a system that captures data from a patient's
arrival at the Portsmouth MAU and can be tracked right through to the
point at which they are discharged. To achieve this, Schmidt has
identified a four-stage path to implement electronic patient records
(EPRs): EPR1 captures a patient's entry and exit points, describing the
reasons for referral and discharge; EPR2 provides online access to
scanned notes and a diagnostic planner; EPR3 offers templates for
graded treatments; and EPR4 contains complete care pathways, bolstered
by social and nutritional information.

The benefits of this system for quality of care are self-evident, Schmidt
says. In addition to easing the flow of information about a patient and
providing an 'audit trail' for their treatment, the system should also
deliver efficiency gains: "A lot of patients are re-admitted to hospital
unnecessarily because only 50 per cent of discharge notes reach GPs
within five days" he says.

At present, Schmidt is well into the first stage of the four-stage project,
but two obstacles lie in his path: technology and funding. The main
technology requirements are an XML-enabled browser interface that
complies with government metadata standards, a short-range secure
wireless network to deliver EPRs to clinicians on the move, and
document scanning equipment to capture content from paper-based
notes.

The first two requirements are more complex than the third because they
are also bound up with expectations and habits. Diseases, treatments and
prescriptions, for example, may not be described in the same way in
different countries, making it difficult to settle on a single metadata
system. Having mobile access to a patient's records is appealing, but
different situations will favour different access devices: a palmtop device
can be carried easily and discreetly, but is unlikely to impress a
consultant doing rounds and needing to display records to a group of
doctors. "Many doctors have turned into Doctor No - if they can't get on
with new technology quickly, they refuse to use it," says Schmidt.

Despite these hurdles, the single biggest headache for Schmidt faces is
funding. He claims to be building the Portsmouth MAU on "virtually no
budget" and prefers not to put a figure on its total cost. Cash flows into
his project in a piecemeal way. "Money for technology is like a car in the
night: you flag down anything that comes along because there aren't
many and when it's gone, it's gone," he says.

NOTE: To view slides presented by Schmidt to the Southern Institute for
Health Informatics conference, see:
http://fastlink.headstar.com/schmidt



-- 
From one of the Linux desktops of Dr Adrian Midgley 
http://www.defoam.net/             

Reply via email to