On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 17:59, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 14:41 Mon 30 Jan , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting r. Yael Kalka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > =================================================================== > > > --- include/opensm/osm_svn_revision.h (revision 5203) > > > +++ include/opensm/osm_svn_revision.h (working copy) > > > @@ -1 +1 @@ > > > -#define OSM_SVN_REVISION "" > > > +#define OSM_SVN_REVISION "5203M" > > > > This looks like a mistake. > > And, I think this shows that keeping the generated file osm_svn_revision.h > > represents a problem. > > Good point. Hal, could we svn-remove this file?
Yes, this is possible but there is a little more work involved here as the OSM_SVN_REVISION is checked for length 0 to determine whether to print out the svn version message right now. -- Hal > > Sasha. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
