On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:58:18PM -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > >We're trying to create *inter-operable* hardware and > >software in this community. So we follow the IB standard. > > Atomic operations and RDD are optional, yet still part of the IB "standard". > An > application that makes use of either of these isn't guaranteed to operate with > all IB hardware.
But those are example of things which are actually written down in the standard. The example we were talking about isn't. > But I do not see an issue with a vendor adding value beyond what's defined in > the spec. Neither do I. If you think so, you haven't understood my argument. -- greg _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
