On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:29 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > This patch removes rdma_get/set_option().  Is that what you intended?
> 
> Yes.  I wanted to reconsider the approach here.
> 
> I believe that there's a cleaner implementation for getting path records that 
> involves a userspace SA library/daemon than going through the rdma cm.  And 
> no 
> one was using the option to set a specific path.
> 
> For the CM timeout options, those were added to support uDAPL, but I believe 
> that a better approach which would accomplish the higher level goal is to 
> have 
> the kernel rdma cm issue MRA (message received acknowledged) messages for 
> clients which are slow to respond to requests.
> 

Ok thanks.  For my testing, I'll remove this code from uDAPL...

Steve.




_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to