I still don't understand / agree with the objection on openid-specs-native-sso. That's the intent and the primary use case. It will be far more appealing / understandable to the mobile app developers than 'single authorization agent'. -- Ashish
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Paul Madsen <[email protected]> wrote: > oh and I guess I should have mentioned the plans for a PRISMA subgroup > ...... > > On 7/17/13 7:51 PM, John Bradley wrote: > > Ok you have a point. NSAA then. > > I want it in red. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2013-07-17, at 7:28 PM, =JeffH <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > request that the name be changed to "Native Single Authorization Agent", with > the mailing list name openid-specs-nssa > > but "Native Single Authorization Agent" yields "nsaa" rather than "nssa", > yes? > > thus "openid-specs-nsaa" ? > > =JeffH > > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing > [email protected]http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing > [email protected]http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > > > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > >
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
