Would call that sign on once and authorize multiple From: Torsten Lodderstedt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:41 PM To: Chuck Mortimore Cc: Anthony Nadalin; John Bradley; [email protected]; John Ehrig; Don Thibeau Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
As far as I understand the group's charter, the user shall login to the authz agent once and in turn use the respective identity across apps on the same device. I would call this SSO. Am 17.07.2013 um 20:54 schrieb Chuck Mortimore <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: I disagree. The functional goal of this, at least from a user's perspective, should be Single Sign-On. -cmort On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Anthony Nadalin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I would have been too young back in the 90s I don’t like SSO in the name as this is basically this is just a way to authorize an app to interact with one or more resource serves on your behalf From: Paul Madsen [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:39 AM To: Don Thibeau Cc: Anthony Nadalin; Mike Jones; John Bradley; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; John Ehrig Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group I am 99% confident that *our* beloved Tony was not part of the R&B group from Oakland, briefly popular in the 90s..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony!_Toni!_Ton%C3%A9! On 7/17/13 2:33 PM, Don Thibeau wrote: Paul I don't think "Tony Tony Tony" is a good name for a working group :) Don Thibeau The OpenID Foundation<http://openid.net> On Jul 17, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Paul Madsen wrote: Tony Tony Tony, how I've missed our time together The WG's mandate is to profile OIDC to enable an SSO model for native mobile applications. Can you suggest a better (concise & memorable) descriptor for a mail list identifier? paul On 7/17/13 2:17 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: That’s a totally useless name From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Madsen Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:59 AM To: Mike Jones Cc: John Bradley; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; John Ehrig; Don Thibeau Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group that list name is fine thanks On 7/17/13 1:51 PM, Mike Jones wrote: John, are you able to create the new mailing list at lists.openid.net<http://lists.openid.net> or do we have to ask [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> for the list creation? Paul and other WG creators, what name do you want the list to have? openid-specs-native-sso? -- Mike From: Don Thibeau [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:03 AM To: Paul Madsen Cc: n-sakimura; John Ehrig; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; John Bradley; Mike Jones Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group John Ehrig can set up the web site space and the online Docusign process for IPR collection. If done right away it saves all concerned lots of time and hassle. Don Thibeau The OpenID Foundation<http://openid.net/> On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Paul Madsen wrote: Thanks Nat, Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG list & page logistics? Paul On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote: The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of the OpenID Process Document v.1.5 of 2009. A new mailing list should be established promptly per section 4.3 of the above document. Also, a WG web pages should be set up at openid.net<http://openid.net/>. You should also ask the secretary of the foundation to announce the first meeting of the WG, in which scope approval and the chairs selection should be done. Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has collected the IPR agreement from the participants, so it may not be as quick as you may wish, but it has to be done. BTW, NRI's agreement is already in as we have a blanket agreement like Google. Nat (2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote: Next steps? ----------- Paul Madsen Ping Identity Anthony Nadalin<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential for IPR from both Apple and Facebook. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of n-sakimura Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group Could you kindly spell it out? From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast application switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued thing that we have, and iOS's native login support given to facebook, twitter, and Weibo. Perhaps you are thinking of something else. Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/ and http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233<http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html%23//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233> as well. Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps it is a task for an industry consortia like OpenID Foundation to go and ask Apple to open up the API for other IdPs as well. Do not know if they are going to listen, but still, it might be our duty to try. Nat (2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote: I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the Facebook SSO (iOS) IPR with this effort. -- Nat Sakimura ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. Tel:+81-3-6274-1412<tel:+81-3-6274-1412> Fax:+81-3-6274-1547<tel:%2B81-3-6274-1547> PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
