Of course it's me, but i think it suggests it's on par with sol 11 express which is snv_151a. As oi_147/8 was based on snv_147/8
But as we of course have to get used to oi being a real fork of solaris, why not change the numbering scheme ? Bruno PS : Please, do not think I'm complaining, I'm not ----- Mail Original ----- De: "Dan Swartzendruber" <dswa...@druber.com> À: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" <openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Juin 2011 17h46:53 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zfs only to version 5 after upgrading to oi-151? Bruno Damour wrote: > Hello, > > Still, this is an (at least for me) important drawback, because that means > that there is no possibility to "upgrade" from solaris 11 express. > I thought that the goal was to be compatible with solaris 11 express, and > assumed that zfs/zpool versions would also be. > Of course I understand the difficulties, but isn't the numbering (151) > slightly misleading ? > AFAIK the base is still snv_148+patches for core elements, even if JDS, > etc... is in line with solaris 11 express. > How is this misleading? I don't see how '151' implies 'zfs/zpool versions at least as new as SE11'? _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss