So are people up for netqmail, daemontools, djbdns packages?
On Sunday, April 22, 2012 08:34 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
Which brings us back to qmail. I've been using it flawlessly starting
on a Sparc IPC running SunOS before Postfix was a gleam in Wietse
Venema's eye. The darn thing is rock solid, secure, lightweight, and
fast. That said, I have nothing against Postfix other that I've never
had a reason to look further than qmail.
You did. That's why you are not running qmail-smtpd. Not even a patched
qmail-smtpd. Yes, DJB designed qmail to be modular and using third-party
modules is far game but using third-party modules already means it is
not qmail. Stop deluding yourself. qmail's main problem has always been
back-scatter due to lack of smtp time recipient checking not mention all
the other host of things one needs/wants do before accepting message
body data.
You have looked beyond qmail and decided to stick with dot-qmail and
other goodies and found yourself a qmail-smtpd replacement.
Gary
On 4/22/12 8:26 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 22/04/12 12:50 AM, Magnus Hedemark wrote:
If we're going out on limbs, Haraka might be worth a look.
http://haraka.github.com/
One still needs a proper mta on a later stage with haraka if used for
incoming...
Sounds more like a smtp proxy with filtering/authentication
capabilities.
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
