anyway... postfix is the better today :D I saw using Qmail long time ago, I like it, but is obsolete
Also, I have my compiled Qmail and configured just as "personal email museum" Thread name: "Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?" Mail number: 17 Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 In reply to: Christopher Chan <christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> > > On Monday, April 23, 2012 08:44 PM, låzaro wrote: > >in Qmail, the security is patch-maked in postfix is by-design-maked > > NO, that is not accurate. "security" where it means anti-spam, DJB > did not bother because as far as he is concerned, the way things > are, things are just broken. Too bad his idea of how email should > work never took off. So any anti-spam features are provided by > THIRD-PARTIES. It is not 'patch-maked'. There is zero anti-spam. > > As for postfix, 'by-design-maked' just means Wietse put in the time > to develop postfix unlike DJB who stopped in 1998. > > >for example, smtp auth, SASL, TLS and soon. Also postfix is more > >modular. You can use it with someSQL LDAP and all thats cute things. > > There is a qmail fork that does both sql and ldap too. postfix is > only better because its developer continued to work on the code and > keep up with the times and he built a good reputation while at it. > > No qmail fork has ever managed that because of DJB's stand on > licensing but now that qmail is public domain, maybe in the future > one of these forks might. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss -- _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss