2012/8/13 Günther Alka <a...@hfg-gmuend.de>: > with SAMBA and winbind you may loose: > > - snaps via Windows previous version > - Windows compatible ntfs4 ACL (only Posix ACL ?) > - SMB as a ZFS property > - interoperability with NFS4 > - movable pools that keep ACL intact > - performance, kernel based CIFS server is mostly faster > - CIFS is managed by Illumos, not a third party product that cares mostly > about Linux > - napp-it integration > > From Windows and interoperability view CIFS is much better. > A minimal solution may be using at least the UID/GID provided by idmap for > already created AD users, optionally add a SID->UID/GID entry in this > database. > > In this case, you do not write proper ACL but use at least the same UID/GID > like CIFS > I have not tried if CIFS is using the proper SID via idmap when there is only > a UID/GID entry in files.
What about the fact that ephemeral ids are not static ie discarded when the server reboots? -f _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
