REALLY???  I didn't know this.  Thank you very much.  

This sounds like a much safer and better way to go than risking having problems 
from operating system level limitations.

God bless you.



On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:00 AM, Matt Clark wrote:

> I would highly recommend dovecot as an IMAP server.  It's fast, secure, easy 
> to configure, very well maintained and also very flexible about virtual user 
> management.
> 
> See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers
> 
> 
> On 12 Dec 2012, at 03:04, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com 
> <dormitionsk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yikes!  I think this is a little beyond my abilities.  I'm a lot more of a 
>> programmer than a system admin.
>> 
>> I think a more reasonable approach for me would be that if I run into 
>> problems with the long user names using uw-imap, to just use Cyrus-Imap 
>> instead.  It doesn't require system user accounts.  I didn't like it as well 
>> as uw-imap when I tried it for a while on Linux several years ago.  It's a 
>> lot harder to administer and it's not nearly as "mobile" as uw-imap.  By 
>> "mobile", I mean that with uw-imap, it's a lot easier to move people's mail 
>> from one server to another, and to restore inadvertently deleted mailbox 
>> folders, etc.  
>> 
>> I appreciate the suggestion, though.  I really do.
>> 
>> I'm an Orthodox Christian priest-monk, and for what it's worth, I pray for 
>> all of you OI developers.  I greatly appreciate all of the hard work you are 
>> putting into making OI a viable and freely available Solaris-based operating 
>> system.  And I know my God has most certainly helped me on several occasions 
>> to get our OI server I've been working on these past few weeks to get it to 
>> the point where it's almost ready to put online.  I don't think that with as 
>> much help as He's given me with this, that he'll abandon the OI Project, or 
>> you all, from His care.
>> 
>> Thank you again.
>> 
>> Peter, hieromonk
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 10, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2012-12-11 01:54, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>> Peter,
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you very much for your feedback.  I really appreciate it.
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any particular tests that you think I should run, just to make 
>>>> sure that I'm not likely to run into corrupted emails three or four months 
>>>> down the road, well after I've implemented OI?
>>>> 
>>>> I figured I'd test it with sending, replying to, etc. emails of various 
>>>> different scenarios, just to be on the safe side.  But if you think I 
>>>> should test anything in particular, I'd appreciate your thoughts.
>>> 
>>> Is an alternate solution possible for you: use an LDAP catalog
>>> with email data for users (as well as POSIX data for UNIX accounts)?
>>> 
>>> This way you can have short "uid" values and arbitrarily long
>>> mail, mailEquivalentAddress or mailAlternateAddress properties.
>>> One of these may be "u...@domain.com" to avoid ambiguity, but
>>> is not required to be.
>>> 
>>> There are a number of tutorials about making the Solaris operating
>>> environment a client of LDAP (Sun DSEE, OpenDJ, OpenLDAP, etc.);
>>> however, the mail subsystem will require its own integration for
>>> mail routing to the mailbox server ("mailHost"), alias address
>>> processing, etc. It is well documented for Sendmail in the internet,
>>> I am not sure about uw-imap. Don't think it should have problems...
>>> 
>>> Also note that you'd want to avoid a deadlock (rather, a needless
>>> startup delay) by making an operating environment (global or local
>>> zone) which hosts the LDAP service a UNIX-client of this service.
>>> If you must do that, make the LDAP server start up before the SMF
>>> service ldap/client. I'd just put different tasks in local zones,
>>> LDAP server into one, mail into another, global zone as hypervisor
>>> with no end-users (except admins) and no LDAP client.
>>> 
>>> HTH,
>>> //Jim Klimov
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
>>> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
>> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> 


_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to