Hi Tim, I don't recall creating them with slices; like you say, only the root pool needs that, which was done because originally it had two SSD units for root in another machine.
There was a bit of kerfaffery with other versions, but I do beleive I copied everything off, then destroyed the set and re-created it ... ... but given what you're saying, I think I'm better to copy all the data off again, blast the pool and re-create again using whole drives. Many thanks, Michelle. On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:06:14 -0500 (CDT) Tim Mooney <tim.moo...@ndsu.edu> wrote: > In regard to: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ZFS replacement problem, > Michelle...: > > > pool: tank > > state: ONLINE > > scan: resilvered 1.70M in 0h0m with 0 errors on Tue Jun 3 18:19:48 > > 2014 config: > > > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > tank ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c3t4d0s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c3t2d0s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c3t3d0s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > > errors: No known data errors > > > > > > I try ... > > > > mich@jaguar:~# zpool replace -f tank c3t4d0 c3t0d0 > > cannot replace c3t4d0 with c3t0d0: no such device in pool > > Your devices have partitions (aka slices, the s1 at the end), but > you're not using that with the replace. Try adding "s1" to the end > of both and see if that makes a difference. > > Note that that means there actually will need to be an "s1" on the > replacement drive, which means you probably need to use "format". > > Tim _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss