Dear all,

Planning ahead. It would be nice to compile Anaconda for science
sometime in the future.

Regards,


Robert

https://www.ch.cam.ac.uk/computing/software/anaconda-scientific-python-distribution



On 17/04/2021 18:24, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss wrote:
> I'm about to set up  an HP Z840 with 1x 14 core E5-2690 V4,  a 4x 4 TB RAIDZ2 
> array and 4x 16 GB ECC DIMMs.
>
> The dbx implementation in the Oracle/Sun/Forte compiler suite is the only 
> debugger I've encountered which will evaluate F77 intrinsics on the command 
> line.  This is immensely valuable to a scientific programmer.  Without that 
> one must use temporary variables when debugging.  While the optimization 
> process will remove the overhead, it makes the code quite long winded and 
> ugly.
>
> I currently have Studio 12.1 on Hipster 2017.10 and have not seen any issues, 
> though more serious work has been done on my S10 u8 system.  I tend to prefer 
> mixed F77 and C89 for reasons of portability and the vast number of high 
> quality scientific libraries available.
>
> It seems to me that 14 cores and 64 GB of DRAM should be sufficient to run 
> S11.4 in a VM if I *really* need the latest Studio version. The Z840 will 
> take 12 more DIMMs so I can easily expand memory and add a 2nd 14 core 
> E5-2690 V4 if needed. 
>
> This inclines me to use Hipster as the base OS and use VirtualBox to run 
> S11.4, Win 7, Debian and an OI build system in VMs when needed with a fall 
> back of a Z400 and swappable disks if MMU limitations constrain performance 
> too much.
>
> Ten years ago a VM was not viable for building OI, but 14 cores and 64 GB of 
> DRAM seems to me likely to handle it.  Is an OI VM running on top of OI 
> viable for building and testing?  In particular, how good is VBox for that?  
> it's become very Windows host oriented.  I'm also aware the Solaris USB 
> support is not very good.  I'll have Win 7 and Debian available  running 
> native on a Z400 if USB proves an issue for working with microcontrollers 
> which is my primary use case for both of those.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Have Fun!
> Reg
>
> _______________________________________________
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to