> On 1. May 2021, at 10:31, Michelle <miche...@msknight.com> wrote: > > Well, I looked over my notes and the last time I did this was in 2014. > > My preference has always been to run OI on its own drive and have the > main ZFS tank as a "whole drive" basis. However, thanks to the QNAP, > that's changed. > > In 2014 I did a test. I took two 40gig drives and did the partitions as > an all free hog on partition 0 ... I was simply testing the ability to > configure rpool on two drives and have both active, so if one failed > the other would keep running the OS. > > My immediate thought is to have 100gig for the OS on partition 0 and > the rest on partition 1. Also, turn on auto expand for the tank pool > and off for the rpool. > > That's my gut feel. > > Anyone got any advice to offer please, before I commit finger to > keyboard? > > Michelle. In general, it is good idea to keep autoexpand off, this is especially for mirror. You do not want to have unexpected pool growth. rgds, toomas _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Partitions for co-exist NAS drive
Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss Sat, 01 May 2021 00:54:59 -0700
- [OpenIndiana-discuss] Partition... Michelle
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ... Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ... Michelle
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discu... Michelle
- Re: [OpenIndiana-d... Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discu... Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-d... Michelle
- Re: [OpenIndia... Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [Open... Michelle