On 11/3/21 14:58, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 11/2/21 8:58 PM, Nikola M. wrote:
Wikis do not need "appointed censor" to decide only by itself without
any discussion or process what is to stay on Wiki and what is not,
If you have a publicly writable wiki on the internet you absolutely need
this or your wiki soon becomes full of spam and completely unusable.
It's not the ideal situation, or what anyone wants, but it is reality.
Wikis require someone to do work, not just someone to demand others do
it.
Wikis are created by multiple users and that is how they are created, by
changes of the users themselves.
Problem here is that Wiki is disabled from user access. Disabling both
user access and ability to even allowing it to exist and have a working
wiki is the problem here.
Manpower is not a problem, security is solved by fresh install and
migrating data. If contributors can access and put it up, and manpower
is not the issue..
..there is no problem, but allowing it to happen.
_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
