Randy Dunlap wrote: > Bela Lubkin wrote: >> Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>>> Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these >>>> statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and >>>> remove >>>> all those intialisations? They're unneeded, they increase the vmlinux >>>> image size and there are quite a number of them. Thanks. >> >> Randy Dunlop replied: >> >>> I was just about to send that patch. Here it is, >>> on top of the series-of-12. >> ... >>> -static int bt_debug = BT_DEBUG_OFF; >>> +static int bt_debug; >> >> Is it wise to significantly degrade code readability to work around a >> minor >> compiler / linker bug? > > Is that the only one that is a problem? > > I don't think it's a problem. We *know* that static data areas > are init to 0. Everything depends on that. If that didn't work > it would all break. > > I could say that it's a nice coincidence that BT_DEBUG_OFF == 0, > but I think that it's more than coincidence.
It's Corey's decision. However, while code readability is also very important to me, I disagree with "significantly" above. -- ~Randy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
