On 08-18 12:27, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > > > > 3) It appears the response to the GET_DEVICE_ID command, though a > > response is returned, is not valid. The right way to handle this would > > be to do more validation in the ssif_detect() function. It doesn't do > > any validation of the response data, and that's really what needs to be > > done. > > > > do_cmd() in ssif_detect() already do validation. Perhaps, > ssif_probe() should just not return ENODEV in case of error. >
Oh, I wanted to say ssif_detect, not ssif_probe. Regards, Ivan _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
