On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Mike Hommey <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not > > to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package, > > and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are > > things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps > > would need. > > > > This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your > > packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about? > > Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd > > encounter. > > At the moment gnash expects npapi.h under /usr/include/xulrunner* > dirs. Fixable by making it look for it also under > /usr/include/iceweasel*. Will ubuntu move headers to /u/i/firefox*?
AFAICT, Ubuntu has a firefox-dev package that only contains NPAPI headers in /usr/include/firefox. I don't think that would be enough for all rdeps we have in Debian. I think some are not NPAPI plugins. Anyways, I guess most rdeps are just using the mozilla-*.pc files. I'll at least add the mozilla-plugin.pc one in next upload (which I'll do tomorrow morning, after I confirm only armel is broken). That should help most. > How about linking /u/i/xulrunner -> /u/i/iceweasel-N instead? > > BTW would packaging npapi-sdk still be a good alternative? > > https://bugs.debian.org/642168 Definitely, yes. Mike _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
