By 'deployment team' you mean Mark Howe, etc? There's no other team working on anything to do with deployment right?
On 19/07/2013, at 12:22 AM, Joe McGlynn <joe.mcgl...@oracle.com> wrote: > No, the deployment team works on these, not the FX team. It's the same bits > for FX and Swing/AWT when running browser-deployed apps (which includes > applets and web start). Deployment, FX and Swing are all part of the Java > client org. > > There are a number of bug fixed being worked in this area, as well as new > requirements around how to deploy a secure applet or web start app. The > deploy code base is currently identical between 7u and JDK 8. If you are > working with deploy technologies you should know this area is rapidly > changing and I'd strongly advise staying on the latest release (currently > 7u40 EA) and following the updates to the docs, especially around best > practices for deployment. > > In short, these are: > > Buy a code signing certificate from a recognized CA and sign your app > Use the new "permissions" and "codebase" JAR manifest attributes > > I'd recommend avoiding the use of "mixed code" if at all possible as that > results in additional warning prompts to the end user and additional runtime > risks. > > I'd also recommend testing your app with the security slider at the "Very > High" level with every update of the JRE. Typically new restrictions are > introduced first at Very High, and then propagated down into High and > ultimately Medium over time. > > If there are problems using deployment with FX, of course report the issue > and the team will investigate. I'm aware of one problem that causes some FX > web start apps not to work with the latest release. It's being investigated > right now. > > > > On Jul 18, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Daniel Zwolenski <zon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sure, but no one other than the JFX team are (or will be) working on these >> right? They are effectively desktop technologies and no other team has any >> interest in them I'm guessing? >> >> I'd assume if they're not on the JFX roadmap, they're not on the Java >> roadmap? >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Artem Ananiev >> <artem.anan...@oracle.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> On 7/18/2013 3:00 AM, David Ray wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Richard, >>>> >>>> I don't see any mention of WebStart and JavaFX on the milestone list - >>>> are issues surrounding (and suffocating :)) WebStart going to addressed as >>>> part of the JDK release 8 instead? >>>> >>> >>> Java Plugin and Java Web Start are not parts of JavaFX (although JavaFX >>> provides some APIs for them), they are shared between JDK and JavaFX and >>> released as a part of Oracle JDK8 (not included to OpenJDK). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Artem >>> >>> >>> David >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Jul 17, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> Our dates match up with JDK 8: http://openjdk.java.net/** >>>>> projects/jdk8/milestones<http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/milestones> >>>>> >>>>> Feature complete was a month ago (but little API tweaks continue to >>>>> happen). Things are supposed to be reasonably stable by October 24 (Zero >>>>> Bug Bounce http://openjdk.java.net/**projects/jdk8/milestones#Zero_** >>>>> Bug_Bounce<http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/milestones#Zero_Bug_Bounce>) >>>>> and GA in March. >>>>> >>>>> Richard >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Peter Penzov <peter.pen...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I'm new to JavaFX I'm interested what is the current progress of >>>>>> development of JavaFX 8. I want to use it for base framework for my >>>>>> enterprise application but I have concerns is it stable to be used? Can >>>>>> you >>>>>> give me some information do you plan to add something else before the >>>>>> official release? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >
