This is intentional to preserve compatibility for existing internal code
(testing tools and deployment code) to avoid regressions. I will file a
follow-on issue to find and eliminate this difference, since it does
seem like an unnecessary inconsistency. Thanks for pointing this out.
-- Kevin
Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
Hi,
I think there is an inconsistency between :
PlatformImpl.java
public static void startup(final Runnable r) {
+ startup(r, false); //************* here default value false
+ }
and
Platform.java
+ public static void startup(Runnable runnable) {
+ PlatformImpl.startup(runnable, true); //******** here default value
true
+ }
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Jonathan and all,
Please review the following new API proposal to add the ability to
explicitly start the FX runtime.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090585
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8090585/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekcr/8090585/webrev.00/>
-- Kevin
--
Best Regards,
Ali Ebrahimi
