> I see. I’m not close to this spec. I am not sure if it worths
further clarification such as “it is a public member”. I’ll leave it up
for you to decide.
I like this suggestion, so I will change it before I push.
Thanks.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
On Mar 6, 2017, at 7:11 AM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Mandy Chung wrote:
On Mar 4, 2017, at 5:14 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8170701/webrev.01/
40 * object {@link Module#isOpen opens} the containing package to the
Nit: s/@link/@linkplain
41 * {@code javafx.fxml} module, either in its {@link ModuleDescriptor}
42 * (module-info.class) or by calling {@link Module#addOpens}.
Do you intend to take out “(module-info.class)”?
I was thinking to leave it in, since module-info.class is the most
common way to specify a ModuleDescription. Maybe better would be:
@{link ModuleDescriptor} (e.g., in its module-info.class)
That’s okay.
43 * An object is also reflectively accessible if it is declared as public,
Does “it” mean its constructor?
No. It means the declaration itself, for example:
@FXML
public String myString;
as opposed to:
@FXML
private String myString;
I see. I’m not close to this spec. I am not sure if it worths
further clarification such as “it is a public member”. I’ll leave it
up for you to decide.
Mandy
