Submitted a new bug with ID: 9052190.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Nir Lisker wrote:
If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs"
even though the exact changes I'm proposing are not listed there,
but I can submit a new bug just for those if it really matters
(it will be another Fix Typos issue).
We'll need a new JBS bug, since that one is already resolved with
a changeset (every changeset needs a unique bug ID). Feel free to
use the same synopsis if you like.
I also note that with simple javadoc changes, this can be
done prior to your OCA being recorded if you like
Yes, as a Participant. Iv'e signed the Sun CA some 7 years ago
and this week signed the OCA in case it didn't transfer over.
It's not crucial to handle it right now since the changes are
trivial.
Good.
I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday
It's a bit of a loaded one so it can wait after the RDP. I only
needed the minimum info to get these fixes before the RDP.
OK.
-- Kevin
- Nir
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>
wrote:
> I also note that tith simple javadoc changes...
"with" simple ...
-- Kevin
Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Nir Lisker wrote:
> This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
Yes it does, which is why I asked about it yesterday.
I'll send a webrev.
Ah, I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday, since
I was on vacation and am still catching up. If you can
send a webrev, and a pointer to a JBS issue, I'll attach
it for you. If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then
please file one (and I'll see that it gets moved into the
JDK project quickly). I also note that tith simple
javadoc changes, this can be done prior to your OCA being
recorded if you like.
Thanks.
-- Kevin
Thanks,
Nir
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
<mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>
<mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
<mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>> wrote:
Why would you even try to push a changeset
without getting it
reviewed first???
This shows a lack of understanding about our
processes and
policies. Only committers have permission to push
changesets, and
only after review. Please familiarize yourself
with the policies
and procedures surrounding contributing to
OpenJFX [1] [2] [3] [4]
[5]. Once you are familiar with these policies
and have signed the
Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) you can work
with someone to
sponsor your change.
-- Kevin
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
<http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/>
<http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
<http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/>>
[2]
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
<http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html>
<http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
<http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html>>
[3]
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report>
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report>>
[4]
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews>
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews>>
[5]
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code>
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
<https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code>>
Nir Lisker wrote:
Iv'e created a small documentation fix and
tried to push it to
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt
<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt>
<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt
<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt>>. I
got an error:
abort: push creates new remote head 2152a80ee902!
hint: pull and merge or see 'hg help push'
for details about
pushing new
heads
[command returned code 255 Tue Jan 09
19:40:10 2018]
What can be the problem?
