On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:40:10 GMT, Scott Palmer <swpal...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:56:58 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 19:11:48 GMT, Scott Palmer <swpal...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Added tabSize property to Text and TextFlow and -fx-tab-size CSS attribute 
>>> to both.  TextFlow's tab size overrides that of contained Text nodes.
>>> 
>>> ----------------
>>> 
>>> Commits:
>>>  - 68d221c7: 8130738: TextFlow's tab width is static
>>> 
>>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/32/files
>>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/32/webrev.00
>>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130738
>>>   Stats: 324 lines in 8 files changed: 260 ins; 0 del; 64 mod
>>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/32.diff
>>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/32/head:pull/32
>> 
>>>  I should clamp so it reads back as 1 - Fixed.
>> 
>> This has implications for binding, etc., so I suspect this is not what we 
>> want. I'll look into this more when I review it.
>> 
>> NOTE: This will need a CSR in addition to two reviewers. You can file the 
>> CSR any time, but I suggest leaving it in Draft state until Phil and I have 
>> had a first pass look at the API.
> 
> The indenting was wrong in that section and I had to make some minor changes, 
> so I corrected the bad indenting.  Kevin indicated, "In your specific case, 
> reformatting the methods in the StyleableProperties nested class that are 
> adjacent to code you add or modify seems fine, as long as you only change the 
> indentation and not the line wrapping."
> 
> I didn't intend to trigger an update to this pull request...I find Git 
> awkward to work with (Mercurial makes more sense to me) so I'm making 
> mistakes as I bumble around. 
> 
> I do expect an update to address the way I've clamped to 1.  I agree with 
> Kevin that it is probable wrong. Just waiting for feedback.

I'll take a preliminary look today. I also plan to change the bug title to make 
it more clear that it is an enhancement request, since it currently reads like 
a bug report (I'll also change the CSR and PR title to match).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/32

Reply via email to