On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 05:06:56 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Here is a slightly modified test program. It fixes a compilation error in >> the previous, and also adds a system property >> to set the number of quads: >> It creates 200 quads by default. If you need to increase this or decrease it >> to get something in the ~ 10 fps range you >> can do that with `-DnumQuads=NNNN`. >> [pointlighttest.zip](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/files/4526179/pointlighttest.zip) > > @kevinrushforth > Member > kevinrushforth commented Apr 18, 2020 > > I think most of those are good suggestions going forward. As for the > performance drop, the only place we've seen it so > far is on graphics accelerators that are a few years old by now. > So 50% drop on a 2015 macbook pro is OK ? Do we have numbers on recent > macbook pros ? If this were an even remotely representative use case, then no, the performance hit would not be OK. The test was designed as an artificial "worst-case" stress test: a single mesh with a large number of very large (window-sized) quads stacked on top of each other. Any real-world use case won't do this. We should make sure that we aren't seeing any significant performance drop when rendering spheres (at a couple different tessellation levels) or boxes. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/43
