On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:10:33 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'm suspecting that this fix might be revealing an issue related to >> [JDK-8199592](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199592). >> Keeping in mind that the revision on which this fix is based does *not* >> include the fix for JDK-8199592, a way to confirm that would be to rebase >> that fix on top of the latest rev and see if the test program still exhibits >> the same behaviour. >> I'll try to do that later on today. > > @fthevenet The truncated line is very likely related to the fix for > [JDK-8199592](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199592). I always > merge in the latest master when doing my testing, which is why I initially > didn't see that particular problem. > > The text spacing is a different problem, since the altered behavior after > applying your fix happens with or without the fix for JDK-8199592. It seems > likely that it is a separate bug exposed by the fix for this bug rather than > caused by it. I did some additional testing this morning, and there is definitely an existing problem with positioning labels and text nodes, which is more noticeable when drawing vertical text. The values I see for layoutX and layoutY of the text node (or label) are not correct either before or after this fix. So with this fix, they are just wrong in a slightly different way. So I don't think this should block the integration of this PR. Rather, this is another follow-up bug that we should file. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/308
