On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 12:14:58 GMT, Ambarish Rapte <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Nir Lisker has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Corrected comment tags
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/layout/Background.java
> line 357:
>
>> 355:
>> 356: /**
>> 357: * A convenience factory method for creating a background with a
>> single {@code Paint}. The background will use the
>
> Suggestion to rephrase as:
> `A convenience factory method for creating a Background by specifying only
> the {@code Paint} for BackgroundFill`
Since the `Background` constructors take a list of `Paint` objects, I think
saying a "single" `{@code Paint}` is helpful. I can see how adding "for
`BackgroundFill`" (or maybe "as a `BackgroundFill`"?) might make it clearer.
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/layout/Background.java
> line 361:
>
>> 359: *
>> 360: * @implSpec This call is equivalent to {@code new Background(new
>> BackgroundFill(fill, null, null));}.
>> 361: * @param fill the fill of the background
>
> `@param fill Any Paint. If null, the value Color.TRANSPARENT is used.`
>
> Picked from BackgroundFill constructor's doc
Good idea to indicate what happens on `null`, although that might be better in
the description?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/610
